This sixth post in our Legal Theory in Brief Series explores the famous Hart–Fuller debate over whether law possesses an “inner morality,” contrasting Hart’s claim that even immoral regimes can create valid law with Fuller’s argument that true law requires adherence to moral procedural principles that enable human agency and justice.

In this fifth post in our Legal in Brief Series, David McIlroy explores and contrasts H.LA. Hart’s notion of Rules with Wesley Hohfeld’s notion of Rights and their implications for law.

In this fourth post and video in the series, David McIlroy explores John Locke’s conception of Rights and Authority, and shows how they have shaped our idea of rights and authority in modern society.

In this third post in our series, Legal Theory in Brief, David McIlroy examines the different meanings and defining features of law, contrasting checklist and central case approaches to understanding what truly makes a rule a “law.”

The second instalment in our Legal Theory in Brief Series, David McIlroy introduces us to how we might think Biblically about Law and Justice. Taking us through the broad arc of the biblical story he shows that Scripture has much to say about law and justice and how we might be faithful followers of Jesus in our studies and practice of law.

Abraham Kuyper’s vision of sphere sovereignty and common grace offered a revolutionary alternative to both church dominance and secular totalitarianism, shaping modern ideas of freedom, pluralism, and the role of government.